14 May 2013

Does your SPOT Leave Crumbs?

Flight 8 member Chuck O’Dale’s followers did not get the 1300 miles of bread crumbs promised by his SPOT. He is still waiting to hear SPOT’s explanation. He wonders if he inadvertently disabled the bread crumb feature. If so, folks should be aware how easily and unknowingly this can happen. If not, then why, and how often, does SPOT disable this important safety feature without the knowledge of users?

Chuck notes that, “the people that I rely on to check on my position reports got the following message:

Feed with Id: 0bf8QgAGfWBUNBPU9KmvdPDTACicaqCFm not found.”

On the positive side, Chuck also notes that OK messages were received, but not his position reports. And all the bread crumbs were ultimately stored in his SPOT account.

Is SPOT the ELT supplement that many of us believe it is?

2013 CAHS National Convention and AGM Update

By Conference Chairman Tim Dubé

The Canadian Aviation Historical Society (CAHS) returns to Ottawa-Gatineau for its 50th Convention and Annual General Meeting, 11 - 15 September 2013 – the Big Five O in Ottawa, Ontario.

Celebrating 50 years is a BIG deal and the Big Five O promises CAHS members just that – a BIG deal! In addition to two-days of historical presentations – you’ll have to wait for the Program and Registration Form for our list of speakers and their subjects – the Big Five O will include a number of special events and tours. These begin on Thursday evening with a BBQ and tour of the Canada Aviation and Space Museum (CASM), with the bonus of seeing the ongoing restoration of Canadair C-54GM North Star 17515. On both Friday evening and all day Saturday, the CAHS will be special guests at Vintage Wings of Canada’s Wings Over Gatineau-Ottawa air show. On Sunday, CAHS members will return to the CASM to be witness to the annual Battle of Britain parade and flypast. The Big Five O wraps-up on Sunday evening with an early-Autumn Harvest Feast and the presentation of CAHS awards.

Headquarters for the Big Five O will be the Albert at Bay Suite Hotel in downtown Ottawa. Each newly-renovated, one-bedroom suite includes one or two queen-size beds, a spacious living room (some with a pull-out couch), private bath, and a fully-equipped kitchen. We have secured a rate of just $139.00 plus taxes, per night, single or double occupancy. Make your reservations now by calling 1-800-267-6644 or 613-238-8858 and asking for the “CAHS Annual Convention” Group Rate. Final planning is underway now and we expect to have the Registration Forms, with full program details and costs, in CAHS members hands by mid-June.

External links

11 May 2013

Flight 8 Diaspora May Update

A month ago I described that I was working on boosting Flight 8's presence on Diaspora (D*), attracting new followers there.

By the 10th of April I had managed to attract 120 followers. In pursing this strategy of following anyone interested in aviation subjects we now have 217 followers and growing each day.

As I previously reported D* is a very active, interesting and dynamic on-line community, with lots always going on. The focus does seem in general to be more European, left-leaning and oriented towards issues like free software, politics and human rights, but Flight 8 does create lots of aviation content there. This should make the community more interesting to a greater number of people and hopefully attract more users to come and join us there.

Of course, since all my posts are public, anyone can search for and read them without signing in or creating an account, just by viewing Flight 8 on Diaspora.

Anyone who would to join D* can sign up for an account on any one of a number of pods. My personal account is on Diasp.org and that seems to be a good pod. The Flight 8 account is on the main pod: joindiaspora.com.

External links

02 May 2013

Further to: Can You Trust the TC AIM?

[aim%2520cover%255B2%255D.png]
On 4 April 2013 I posted a complaint about Transport Canada’s AIM, specifically with respect to inconsistencies between two sections dealing with proper radio techniques. See http://copa8.blogspot.ca/search?q=eighteen for details.
Well Transport Canada agrees with my comments as noted in Ron Carter’s message to me. Thanks Ron Carter for getting back to me in a timely fashion.
“Dear Mr. Shaw,
As you are aware, the concerns you expressed in your submission of April 5, 2013, were entered into the Civil Aviation Issues Reporting System (CAIRS) and were assigned file number GO-2476. Your concerns were with respect to the current AIM, which says to say “runway eighteen” on one page but says to use digits, as in "runway one eight" on another page. As a result of my review of the file I would like to take this opportunity to provide you with the following information:
I believe RAC section 4.5.6 “Use of MF and ATF” has it wrong, and the wording in RAC 4.5.6 will therefore be amended to read as follows: "runway one eight", effective October 17, 2013.
I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for sharing your views, as all comments we receive are appreciated.
Sincerely,
Ron Carter
Chief of Flight Standards / Chef des normes de vol Telephone / téléphone: (613) 998-9855 Facsimile / télécopieur: (613) 954-1602 TTY / ATS (613) 990-4500 ron.carter@tc.gc.ca Transport Canada | Place de Ville (AARTA), Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0N8 Transports Canada | Place de Ville (AARTA) Ottawa (Ontario) K1A 0N8 Government of Canada | Gouvernement du Canada

17 April 2013

Project North Star To Visit CFB Trenton

By Bill Tate, Vice-President, Project North Star

Our first planned Special Event is for Friday 14 June 2013, which is a trip to 426 Thunderbird Squadron at CFB Trenton.

While at 426 Squadron our tour will take in the training aspects of the new C-130J Hercules that the RCAF is taking delivery of, replacing the older C-130 models.

The tour will consist of:

  • 10:00 Arrival and welcome by 426 Squadron Commanding Officer, Lieutenant Colonel Damon Perrault, in the foyer
  • 10:05 Intro to the Sedley S. Blanchard Air Mobility Training Center (AMTC)
  • 10:15 AMTC Tour (split group)
  • 12:00 Lunch (Yukon galley) - $10 per person
  • 13:00 AMTC Tour (split group)
  • 14:00 Departure

Here are some of the tour highlights:

  • Fuselage Trainer (FuT)
  • Integrated Procedures Trainer (IPT)
  • Tactical Flight Training Device (TFTD)
  • Weapon System Trainer (WST)
  • Hercules Observer Trainer (HOT)
  • Night Vision Integrated Simulator (NVIS)

After 426 Squadron we will visit the RCAF Memorial Museum along with the restoration shops where we will have the opportunity to talk to their volunteers.

After the museum tour we will have an early dinner at Tomasso's Italian Grille before returning to Ottawa. At this time we have only 11 seats left.

For booking please email to confirm you are coming and mail a non-refundable deposit of $30.00 payable to PNSAC and a post-dated cheque (14 May 2013) for $40.00 payable to PNSAC and in the cheque memo please indicate Trenton trip.

Please mail the completed booking information, including Name of Participant (in full), Date of Birth (dd/mm/yyyy), Preferred Contact Information (e-mail or telephone) and cheques to:

PNSAC
PO Box 44005
541 Montreal Rd
Ottawa ON K1K 4P8

10 April 2013

Flight 8 Diaspora April Update

As I mentioned in my last post a month ago, about Flight 8's presence on Diaspora (D*), I was about to commence a new strategy to attract followers there. This is my report of the last month's efforts.

As I noted previously, I had not pursued finding followers on D* and had instead just simply posted interesting content daily and waited to see how may people would just pick it up and follow my posts there. That resulted in a total of 38 followers accumulated over a year of postings, which isn't too bad on a network of 405,000 people, by just passive means.

In the last 30 days though I set out to find more people to follow and thus to attract more to follow the Flight 8 posts. I did this by mostly signing up people who commented on items posted by people I was already following. I wasn't very diligent about this, but it has resulted in the account now having 120 followers!

Since this has been fun to do over the last month, I will continue this approach and see how many I can sign up over time.

D* remains a very active, interesting and dynamic on-line community, with lots always going on. The focus does seem in general to be more European, left-leaning and oriented towards issues like free software, politics and human rights, but I think organizations like Flight 8 bring some diversity and balance to content there. This should make the place more interesting to more people and hopefully attracting more users to come and join us there.

One thing that is worth mentioning is how polite everyone is on D*. Even though we come from many different places, have different points of view and many people post under pseudonyms, I have yet to see really anything in the way of incivility there, let alone even one single flame. People are remarkably respectful of diversity and that makes it a fun community to belong to.

As you can tell, I think it is fun project to be part of. The software works well and is still being steadily developed by a community of programmers. The two things D* really needs are more users and good quality content. I am enjoying contributing!

Anyone who would like to interact with interesting people from around the world on D* can sign up for an account on any one of a number of pods. As mentioned before, my personal account is on Diasp.org and that seems to be a good pod, in addition to joindiaspora.com, where the flight account is.

External links

08 April 2013

Ottawa International Freezes General Aviation Fees

The Ottawa International Airport Authority has announced that they will not raise GA fees at the present time.

The Airport Authority had indicated last year that they intended to raise fees in line with the Consumer Price Index (CPI), which a year ago had been running at 2.5%. With the cooling economy though the CPI registered only 0.5% over 2012. The authority explained:

We are pleased to announce that, because this increase was so small, we have decided to defer the increase until February 1, 2014. February 1 coincides with the timing of our annual changes to all other aeronautical rates. Accordingly, at the end of November We expect to announce an increase in general aviation fees as Well as any applicable changes to other aeronautical rates, to take effect on the following February 1. We will base the increase in general aviation fees on the increase in CPI from January 2012 to October 2013. On a go forward basis, We plan to continue to use February 1 for any subsequent fee changes for General Aviation. We trust that you will find this deferral to be acceptable.

Canadian Owners And Pilots Association President and CEO Kevin Psutka responded to the announcement, saying, "thank you for deferring an increase. Any relief on the cost of aviation is appreciated."

04 April 2013

Can You Trust the TC AIM? With Caution!

aim cover

TC’s Aeronautical Information Manual, (AIM) is getting more and more out of date. If it is not doing its job get rid of it! I find it depressing to constantly find inconsistencies in TC’s venerable, Aeronautical Information Manual (AIM). Aside from the fact that I was assured they would make section 4.5.2 Traffic Circuit Procedures — Uncontrolled Aerodromes, more adequately reflect the Canadian Air Regulations, that has not happened yet. My suggestion is to follow the regulations not the AIM!

Here is another example of TC’s lack of care. In the section describing how we are to talk on the radio, the newest AIM, and likely all previous editions, says in section 5.7 Use of Numbers,

“All numbers except whole thousands should be transmitted by pronouncing each digit separately.”

That is certainly how I was taught. Fair enough, but then why a few pages earlier in Section 4.5.6, Use of MF and ATF, does it give this example of correct usage,

…“Examples:
Directed: FREDERICTON RADIO, THIS IS PIPER FOXTROT
X-RAY YANKEE ZULU BEACON INBOUND LANDING
RUNWAY EIGHTEEN.”

Hey TC it’s “runway one eight”.

Come on Transport Canada, Canadians, hell pilots, expect and need better!

03 April 2013

COPA Flight 8 and Twitter

Adam Hunt said, “COPA Flight 8 has now been doing social networking on Twitter and Diaspora (D*) for about 14 months, having started in January 2012, so I thought this would be a good time to give an update on how it is going. I manage the flight's D* account, while Mike Shaw handles Twitter, so I will leave it to him to provide an update on that.”

OK, ok, I will bring the Twitter business up to date. First, Twitter, as you likely know is a business that allows free access to sign up, tweet and read tweets, i.e., Twitter postings. I am far less active on Twitter than Adam is on Diaspora.  (The name “Diaspora” sounds like a digital laxative, or something.) Adam does a posting every day or so. I managed a tweet every three days or so. My tweets tend to be topical although several include photos of aircraft taken in China’s Aviation Museum.

I have 107 followers, not many by Twitter standards, but given my limited activity not bad. Most are in North America, a few in Europe and a couple in places like New Zealand. I follow 153 twitter users, most again in North America. I tend to follow users that point to news items, interesting stories or publish interesting photos. For example, Canadian astronaut Chris Hadfield’s postings from the Space Station are amazing. I also follow non-aviation twitters associated with photography and video. As well I follow some economic tweeters. I would follow other COPA Flights but I can only find one other flight using Twitter, Flight 10 from the Saskatoon area.

I haven’t put much effort into seeking followers. I have had almost no comments or re-tweets and I have not commented on many tweets by others. I do not automatically follow those who follow me. I find the number of tweets is just overwhelming even though I follow  a mere 153 others. I like most on Twitter I lurk. I find the newsy links to be especially interesting.

The bottom line, I doubt that twitter has brought any new members or a great deal of interest in Flight 8, but I have found it a fun interesting experience. Certainly better than Facebook. I will continue my limited Twitter efforts. See you on Twitter at @copaflt8.

23 March 2013

Large hangar available at Waterloo

By Robert A. Kozlowski

I am trying to get the word out about the availability of our hangar at Kitchener/Waterloo Airport (CYKF) within the aviation community.

You might know the history behind the Millard family and how they have contributed to Canadian aviation.

The latest venture was an MRO to service Boeing 737s and Airbus A320s at Waterloo.

Unfortunately just as the MRO was getting started, the president Wayne Millard passed away and the family decided to shut down the MRO.

That has left the family with a very large hangar and we are looking for tenants.

Ideally it is best suited for an MRO and/or airline, we are open to referrals and ideas.

Contact:
Robert A. Kozlowski
Vice President of Operations
Millard Properties Ltd/Millardair Inc.
416-986-4686
email

15 March 2013

Foreign Ownership - Huh?

After struggling along financially though the recession of 2008-2011 Cirrus Aircraft was running short of aircraft orders, cash and laying off staff. Things at the Duluth, Minnesota aircraft builder were not looking good. Then in February 2011, Cirrus was sold for US$210M to China Aviation Industry General Aircraft (CAIGA), a subsidiary of Aviation Industry Corporation. CAIGA is wholly owned by the Government of the People's Republic of China.

At the time AVweb's Russ Niles said "Chinese participation in the aviation industry isn't necessarily a bad thing and the folks in Duluth and Grand Forks could have suffered a worse fate. In the absence of a sale, bankruptcy was a real possibility for Cirrus and it might have been hard for a trustee to justify operating the business with the numbers it was showing. As for where it leaves current Cirrus owners and those thinking of buying one, the sale is probably a positive thing." I posted about this event and I agree with Russ, it was either Chinese ownership or the company was probably finished.

Every time North Americans buy Chinese goods, at places like Walmart, the Chinese government makes money and then uses that cash to buy up North American companies. That is just the way whatever we have that passes for free enterprise works these days, at least regarding Chinese state owned companies.

So Cirrus got settled into being owned by probably the richest entity of any kind on the planet, the Government of the People's Republic of China. Suddenly investment was available for mothballed programs like the Cirrus Vision SF50 single engine jet, workers were recalled and production increased. All well and good and as expected.

Then, in early March 2013 it seemed that the company was going, hat in hand, to the city council of Grand Forks, North Dakota, where Cirrus has its secondary plant, asking for a US$950,000 loan to buy a new autoclave. The company already has large outstanding loans from the city and this loan would have just increased the payments.

Even more surprising was the way it turned out, with council initially refusing the loan, concerned about the company's ability to repay it, then relenting, apologizing for the doubt and granting the loan. So now Cirrus can go and order their new autoclave, something they claim will create ten new jobs in Grand Forks.

Personally I don't really get it. Since when is a US city council now a bank, loaning money to companies? Since when do small US municipalities, in one of the most indebted nations on earth, the USA, lend tax money, collected from their residents, to the communist Government of the People's Republic of China, as I noted, probably the richest entity on earth right now? Is this what is meant by capitalism and free enterprise in the 21st century?

I realize that this is all tied to jobs and if Grand Forks wants manufacturing jobs to stay in the city then they have to pay companies to stay there or else some other municipality will lure them away, but the way this loan looks, I think it is really time to rethink that whole flawed premise. Foreign buyouts and investments should not turn out to be a hostage taking.

Americans always tell me how much they hate communism and love their free enterprise system, where anyone can build up a business though sheer determination and hard work. To me a US municipality lending money to the Chinese government to build airplanes to sell to rich Americans doesn't seem to fit any notion of capitalism I know of, no matter how hard I squint.

Feel free to tell me that I am wrong!

Background

Pontiac Airpark House and Hangar News

By André Durocher

At the Pontiac Airpark residents have lots of house and hangar options!

One option is to build just a hangar home and live in it, with no need to build a separate house. The hangar just has look similar to a house, which is very easy to do with a few windows, the use of colour, etc. Decorative hangar doors, available from suppliers such as Higher Power Hydraulic Doors and Hydroswing, can help you to achieve this.

You can also build your garage first, then you will have one year to build your actual house.

Buildings on one lot can be owned by more than one person or family, meaning that a group of pilots can buy a lot together and build their hangar.

More information:

12 March 2013

Ottawa Flying Club to Host Captain Clair Maxwell

From the Ottawa Flying Club

Attention Women in Aviation!!

The Ottawa Flying Club will be hosting a talk on the experiences of women in the field of aviation. The keynote speaker for the afternoon is RCAF Captain Clair Maxwell, a commercial helicopter pilot who now specializes in helicopters and UAV accident investigations.

In addition, Major Pascale Cloutier, the president of the Ottawa-Gatineau Women in Aviation Chapter will be here to discuss their scholarship program.

Details

  • When: Friday March 15 at 1330 hrs
  • Where: OFC basement classroom

10 March 2013

Social Networking - A Year Later

COPA Flight 8 has now been doing social networking on Twitter and Diaspora (D*) for about 14 months, having started in January 2012, so I thought this would be a good time to give an update on how it is going. I manage the flight's D* account, while Mike Shaw handles Twitter, so I will leave it to him to provide an update on that.

The background on D* and what it is, is explained in my first post about it. Basically it is like a combination of Twitter and Facebook, but built on free software, community owned and run, with no ads. Unlike Facebook, D* doesn't make money selling your data to advertisers and instead relies on donations and T-shirt sales to get by. I have made a couple of small donations in the flight's name to help the project out. Also unlike Facebook, D* has attracted people from all over the world to exchange ideas, rather than write about what they had for lunch. This all makes it a very interesting place to be, even though it is a smaller community than Facebook is.

I gave an early look at how things were going for Flight 8 on D* in March 2012.

On D* it is easy to control who can see things posted. For Flight 8's posts I have made all the content public, meaning anyone on the internet can see all the posts at www.joindiaspora.com/u/copaflight8.

My approach has been to post something pretty much every day, usually first thing in the morning. In general I have been posting aviation photos from fly-ins from my own collection and also photos contributed by Flight 8 members Michael Dixon and Nathalie Huard. To give a break from photos I have posted aviation videos about various types of aircraft, focusing on amateur video. I have also posted flight news, like upcoming meetings and when write-ups on meetings have been made available on the flight 8 website. I also occasionally repost other people's aviation posts, although I try to keep reposts to a minimum. The overall effect I have been going for is to present an interesting and positive look at personal aviation though photos and video.

In terms of attracting followers my approach has been passive, to just post good content with very broad tags and see how many people I could attract to follow the postings. The result has been that after more than a year I have three Flight 8 members and 35 other people following the account, which is not too bad for no direct effort to attract people beyond posting content.

I have used the flight account to "like" and comment on other people's posts, which in turn has attracted more followers. The one thing to be careful of though is what is commented on, as I have been trying to avoid "inappropriate material" that the flight might not want to be associated with. Unlike Facebook, which is pretty heavily censored, D* is uncensored, meaning you find a real diversity of material posted, especially under tags like #nsfw.

Of the followers that I have, about a half a dozen regularly comment on posts I make, which adds some worthwhile interaction. Many of the followers are from Europe, with a couple from Canada as well, all with some interest in aviation.

Of course there maybe many more people who see the posts through following some of the really broad tags I use such as #aviation and #aircraft, as well as non-signed in people who see them on the open internet as well, but these are difficult to quantify.

Overall I think the flight's presence on D* has been very positive. The account has attracted a small group of fairly dedicated followers and some worthwhile interaction, but naturally it could be improved upon as well!

To that end I plan to embark on a more active campaign to attract followers to the flight 8 account. I'll make another post here in a month or so when the results can been seen!

In the meantime anyone interested in joining us on D* can sign up for an account on any one of a number of pods. My personal account is on Diasp.org and that seems to be a good pod, in addition to joindiaspora.com, where the flight account is.

09 March 2013

Rockcliffe Flying Club to Hold 52nd Anniversary Wings Dinner

The Rockcliffe Flying Club will hold their 52nd Anniversary Wings Dinner at the Canada Aviation and Space Museum on Friday May 3, 2013 at 1815 hrs.

The event will celebrate the achievement of club members over the past year, including licences and ratings earned.

Details:

  • Cocktails 1815 hrs
  • Banquet Dinner 1900 hrs
  • Children’s Programming & Pizza Dinner ($5/child)
  • Silent Auction to raise money for the RFC Scholarship Fund. To contribute items, contact Kathryn Buchan
  • Reservations required
  • Tickets: $45/per person, purchase tickets at RFC Dispatch
  • RSVP: by April 22, 2013 to Kathryn Buchan or at RFC Dispatch at 613-746-4425

05 March 2013

Winter Horseback Riding at Pontiac Air Park

By André Durocher

Above are some recent photos from the equestrian farm's winter activities next to Pontiac Air Park.

Air Park residents and visitors can participate in these activities, riding your own horse or with a rented one. For more information on activities at the equestrian, visit the Élevage Fabie website.

For the latest news about the Pontiac Airpark please check the airpark website.

04 March 2013

Ottawa Flying Club To Hold 85th Annual Wings Dinner

from the Ottawa Flying Club

The Ottawa Flying Club will hold its 85th Annual Wings Dinner on 11 May 2013, so mark the date in your calendars now!

The Wings Dinner is the Ottawa Flying Club's annual celebration to mark the achievements of our student pilots in earning their private, commercial, multi, IFR and other ratings.

The dinner will be held at the Restaurant International - the culinary school's restaurant at Algonquin College.

As well as the awarding of wings for those who have completed their private licenses, other licenses and ratings since since May 2012 the evening will include other awards and a guest speaker, whose name will soon be announced!

Cocktails will be available at 1800 hrs and supper will be served at 1900 hrs. There will be a cash bar.

Tickets will go on sale soon and will cost $35 for students and instructors and $45 for members and guests.

For more news:

01 March 2013

RFC Volunteer Opportunity: Girls' Day at the Airport and Museum

From Rockcliffe Flying Club

The Ottawa chapter of the 99s, the Rockcliffe Flying Club and the Canada Air and Space Museum are holding a number of activities at the Aviation Museum as part of Worldwide Women in Aviation Week. See the website for more information on this event.

We are hosting a flying event on Saturday March 9th (with a rain date on Sunday March 10th). The objective is to introduce girls/women to their first flight. The flights are provided at no charge to the participant. All flights will depart/arrive on Delta, next to the Museum building.

Rockcliffe instructor Jean Rene de Cotret has already recruited pilots for this event, but we are recruiting volunteers for:

  • Registration: To book participants for a time slot for their flight and complete any required paperwork prior to the flight
  • Escorts: To walk the passengers to and from the aircraft and ensure all individuals on the taxiway are accompanied at all times
  • Marshallers: Using standard hand signals, guide aircraft to and from boarding positions to maximize safety and minimize turnaround time
  • Photographers: To take a number of candid pictures throughout the day, as well as photograph each participant for our "photo logbook" and validate our claim for number of passengers flown.

All shifts are for 4 hours (0900-1300, or from 1300-1700). We have listed all shifts for both the primary day (Saturday) and for the rain date (Sunday) – if the event proceeds as planned on Saturday then there will be no shifts on Sunday. If you can volunteer for one day but not the other, no problem, please sign up for what you can.

To indicate your interest in volunteering, sign up on the RFC Volunteer Management System, and indicate the shift of your choice – they are listed under the "Sign Up" tab, under "Girls Day at the Airport and Museum 2013". If you do not yet have an ID in the RFC VMS then you will need to register first at the same link.

26 February 2013

When Foreign Takeovers Fail

I have written quite a lot about the middle and far eastern buyout of North American and European aerospace manufacturers recently, but then there has been lots to report! Back in 2011 it was announced that Diamond Aircraft Canada had been purchased by the Medrar Financial Group of Dubai. Things went bad, though and the repercussions are just being felt this week.

In the 2010-11 period Diamond had embarked on a program of developing new aircraft designs, like the DA50 Super Star, the twin-engined DA52 and especially the D-Jet, its single-engined jet program. This all required capital and the company was running short of money. During the May 2011 Canadian federal election campaign Diamond threatened to close its London, Ontario plant if government help was not forthcoming. The Conservative government didn't bite, said no and the company finally settled on the buyout by Medrar instead in November 2011.

But it was just today that it was officially revealed by Diamond that the deal with Medrar was never completed and no cash changed hands. Diamond had not previously announced that, just quietly taken down the original press release on the deal, although the announcement can still be seen on Archive.org. There was a rumour on 19 February 2013 that the deal with Medrar had failed so I wasn't totally surprised when the lay off announcement quickly followed.

It seems that the company has been surviving on its own shareholder funding for the last 16 months, while it looked for alternatives. That money seems to have run out this past week and Diamond has now laid off the majority of its workers, leaving only those building ordered aircraft and the parts department, to keep the existing fleet flying. The company has indicated that it needs to restructure and then hopes to bring back the majority of its workers. I guess we will see how that pans out over time.

In general I have stated that these sorts of foreign buyouts are good for the aerospace industry, because investment from North American and European sources seems to be totally absent these days. Without these middle eastern and far eastern buyouts companies like Cirrus and Continental would probably not be in business today. Diamond obviously needs some investment and right away, or it may not be in a position to reopen its doors and carry on its development projects.

In a way it is too bad that Diamond's management took such a secretive approach to the Medrar buyout, not announcing that it had failed, because a potential buyer may have seen that and come forward on their own. With this secretive approach I think most people reading the aviation press would have thought that everything was rosy and no help was needed, until the announcement of the lay-offs this week. Perhaps there is a lesson there for other companies?

Hopefully Diamond will find a buyer quickly and get their employees back to work soon.

Here is my revised current list of western aerospace firms bought out so far:

  • Cirrus Aircraft - Government of the Peoples Republic of China
  • Continental Engines - Government of the Peoples Republic of China
  • Enstrom Helicopter Corporation - Chongqing Helicopter Investment Co, China
  • Epic Aircraft - Engineering LLC, Russia
  • Flightstar Sportplanes - rights, tooling and parts inventory purchased by Yuneec International, China
  • Glasair Aircraft - Jilin Hanxing Group, China
  • International Lease Finance Corp - 90% New China Trust Co Ltd, New China Life Insurance Co Ltd, P3 Investments Ltd and China Aviation Industrial Fund
  • Liberty Aerospace - 75% owned by the Kuwait Finance House, a wholly owned subsidiary of Kuwait Finance House of Bahrain
  • LISA Airplanes - 75% owned by Heima Mining Company, China
  • Piper Aircraft - Government of Brunei
  • Superior Air Parts - Weifang Tianxiang Technology Group, China

Further reading

Pontiac Airpark Acquires More Land

By André Durocher

Pontiac Airpark has expanded. Seven parcels of the old Canadian Pacific Railway (CPR) were recently added to the project.

The importance of this acquisition is not the size of the lots, but their strategic location. The 3 km of the old railroad will give access to about 7 km of public road and to Gatineau Park. The trails that will be constructed will be of use to horseback riders, hikers, snowshoers, crosscountry skiers, etc.

This addition is another attractive feature for the future golf, hotel, restaurant and spa project for which I am looking for a developer.

Changes to Remote Communications Outlets (RCO) in Southern Ontario

By Kevin Psutka, COPA President and CEO

Normally, COPA does not announce changes of this sort because members should be making it a regular habit of checking the Aeronautical Information Circulars (AICs) and Service Project Announcements instead of relying on COPA to do that job for them. However, these changes on 7 March affect a large concentration of our members and they present an opportunity to re-emphasize the need to periodically check these important sources of information so that you are not surprised by changes and unable to communicate in a time of need.

COPA has a link on the bottom of the front page of our web site regarding the RCO project and it has been there for several years. The link explains why the system is changing as well as provides links to Nav Canada’s web site where more information as well as maps of the RCO frequencies can be found. Another way to find out what frequency is available for an FIC in the area where you fly is to check the current CFS. Frequencies are listed under the name of the FIC (Pacific (Kamloops), Edmonton, Winnipeg, London, Quebec, Halifax, Whitehorse, Arctic (North Bay)).

Members should note in their calendars the dates when AICs are introduced and check the AICs on these dates for the latest updates. For changes to the RCO network and other service projects, announcements will be made here. Note, for example, the increase in size of the restricted area around Petawawa, which will impact those who fly up the Ottawa River VFR corridor when the larger area is in place by NOTAM, and the airspace review underway in Alberta.

Don’t get caught with a need to reach an FIC but wondering why you can’t reach them. Stay in the know by checking AICs and Service Announcements.

25 February 2013

Another Aircraft Manufacturer Take-Over

I keep asking which western aircraft manufacturer will be the next one bought up and I never seem to have to wait long for the answer.

This week the answer is LISA Airplanes of France. The company is a relatively new start-up that has been working on developing the very sleek and innovative, if expensive, LISA Akoya amphibian. The Akoya is intended to be a two-seat light-sport design with a price tag of US$350,000.

Development had been going well and the design had attracted ten orders already, but in the summer of 2012 the company ran out of money, laid almost everyone off and was placed in receivership. As usual no western investment was forthcoming and things were not looking good for the company until the Heima Mining Company of Leshan City, China offered US$20 million for a 75% stake in the company, controlling interest and the right to name the chairman.

The Heima Mining Company is, well, in the mining business, but has indicated that it is interested in future aerospace acquisitions.

The Heima investment seems to have put things back on track at LISA, the staff rehired and talk of two more production lines being added. The buyout happened just in time, it seems.

So here is the current list of western aerospace firms bought put so far:

  • Cirrus Aircraft - Government of the Peoples Republic of China
  • Continental Engines - Government of the Peoples Republic of China
  • Diamond Aircraft - majority owned by Medrar Financial Group, Dubai
  • Enstrom Helicopter Corporation - Chongqing Helicopter Investment Co, China
  • Epic Aircraft - Engineering LLC, Russia
  • Flightstar Sportplanes - rights, tooling and parts inventory purchased by Yuneec International, China
  • Glasair Aircraft - Jilin Hanxing Group, China
  • International Lease Finance Corp - 90% New China Trust Co Ltd, New China Life Insurance Co Ltd, P3 Investments Ltd and China Aviation Industrial Fund
  • Liberty Aerospace - 75% owned by the Kuwait Finance House, a wholly owned subsidiary of Kuwait Finance House of Bahrain
  • LISA Airplanes - 75% owned by Heima Mining Company, China
  • Piper Aircraft - Government of Brunei
  • Superior Air Parts - Weifang Tianxiang Technology Group, China

So, who will be next?

Further reading

19 February 2013

Mo's Ski Fly-in Coming Up!

By André Durocher

Don't forget Mo's fly-in is on all day next Saturday, 23 February 2013, regardless of the weather. Come and talk about aviation and eat Mo's well known chili!

Right now we have a wheelplane runway 34-16, 2600 feet long and 100 feet wide with a northwest extension of 1000 feet by 50 feet. The runway condition is currently 1 to 2 inches of compacted snow, with no slippery ice showing. The ice thickness is more than 20 inches.

Details:

  • Ski planes can land on the runway or besides the runway.
  • Helicopters can land northwest of the publicity signs close to the shore.
  • 1 mile West of the Ottawa VOR on the Ottawa river.
  • 45-26-57 N, 75-55-48 W
  • Air: 123.2 MHz
  • Ground: 122.75 MHz
  • Transponder: not required

See you there!

18 February 2013

Planning a Flight to the USA?

From Rockcliffe Flying Club

On Saturday 02 March 2013, from 0900 – 1100 at the Canada Aviation and Space Museum, the Rockcliffe Flying Club will hold a seminar to help you plan your next adventure. The seminar entitled “Planning a Flight to the USA?” will be presented by RFC members Tony Hunt and Chris Hobbs.

Subject areas:

  • Planning a flight to the USA?
  • Prerequisites – what you need to arrange before departure
  • Where to find the essential information
  • Flying into the USA
  • The border crossing, the first landing
  • Flight planning inside the US – how different is it?
  • Returning to Canada
  • Q&A – Discussion

Note that RFC members who wish to rent club aircraft for a US flight are required to attend this presentation or a private briefing before a cross-border flight is authorized.

Pilots who have already flown to the US are welcome to join us and share their knowledge. The presentation will be informal, and we will have time for an open discussion of planning tips, destination ideas, and the recommendations of those who have already been.

Please contact Marie-Eve Richard to register for the event: email or 613-746-4425. The cost of the seminar will be $10.

07 February 2013

Bluebird Flight Academy needs manners!

I guess Bluebird gets no spam, or they like it, because they do enough of it on their own. They post many of the inappropriate comments on this blog and it’s getting really annoying! We can only assume that they hold a very low opinion of others, perhaps even their own students.

Bluebird’s comments add no value and for the most part are gratuitous self-advertising. What’s even worse they often comment anonymously. Lacking even the balls to own up to their spam. I think student pilots and aircraft owners are smarter than Bluebird believes and will not get sucked in by Bluebird’s spam.

For those who care, I am complaining about the comments posted on this blog by Bluebird Flight Academy, Chilliwack, BC. The most recent was on a posting advising that Ottawa Flying Club was offering a class on Foreflight. Bluebirds comment was removed from the blog, but I have copied it here for you to see.

“Best flying school in Canada <http://www.bluebirdflightacademy.com> offers pilots a range of flight planning and in flight services.”

We welcome comments that expand, extend, correct, agree or disagree with our postings, but we are getting tired of Bluebird’s ill mannered advertising on our blog.

02 February 2013

Canadian Aviation Historical Society Convention 2013 in Ottawa

The Canadian Aviation Historical Society has announced that its 2013 convention will be held in Ottawa from Wednesday 11 September to Sunday, 15 September 2013.

The dates will put the CAHS members in town for both the Wings Over Gatineau-Ottawa en vol 2013 airshow and the 73rd Battle of Britain Anniversary Ceremony as well.

This convention will mark CAHS's 50th anniversary, as it was founded in 1963.

Details about the convention are still being finalized, so check the CAHS website for further information closer to the date.

Ottawa Flying Club To Offer Foreflight Class

Ottawa Flying Club has announced that they will be offering a one-session class in the use of Foreflight.

Foreflight is a mobile software application for Apple iPads and iPhones that offers pilots a range of flight planning and inflight services. The application has become very popular among pilots in recent years.

OFC's class will be held on Monday 25 February 2013 from 1900-2100 hrs in the OFC Ground School Classroom and will be taught by Alex Petrovic. The class is intended for both advanced and intermediate student pilots and costs $10.00 to attend.

OFC also has an agreement with ForeFlight to offer the ForeFlight Mobile application to OFC students at a reduced subscription cost per year of $49.99, plus HST. To take advantage of this offer contact Andrew Simpson.

31 January 2013

Mascouche Airport - Background

Mascouche Airport is once again under threat of closure in 2013, as explained in the recent post about the petition to save it. I thought a history of the airport would be useful to understanding the larger issues.

Mascouche Airport was built on land that had been set aside for highway construction. The land was not required for the highway in the end and the provincial government agreed to deed it to the municipality on the provision that it be used for public purposes. This is why the airport is located at the junction of Autoroutes 25 and 640 today.

Both the provincial and municipal governments of that day were keen on the idea of building an airport to attract businesses and visitors to Mascouche, bring jobs and provide a general aviation reliever airport for the Montreal area.

The airport was built in 1983 using a total of $1,400,000 in Transport Canada funds under community airport assistance programs in place then. The deals included a 20 year stipulation that it remain an airport from the point of the final $400,000 TC investment in 1991.

Richard Marcotte, the mayor of Mascouche at that time announced in 2002 that he wanted to close the airport, even though it was home to many aircraft, flight training and aircraft maintenance businesses and provided 75 direct jobs to the community. The municipality indicated that it wished to sell the land to a private company, Automobiles Delac Inc, to turn it into a car dealership.

COPA at that time identified this as an indication of the failure of the National Airports Policy that allowed local communities to close airports that were part of a national transportation network, without any regard for users outside their municipality. The association wrote to then Transport Minister David Collenette at the time, but he took no action to protect small airports.

By 2008, with the 20 year clock still ticking, the airport had not been closed, but both COPA and the ABBQ noted that the municipality was spreading the rumour that it would soon close. The municipality was working hard not to promote it, too, even to the point of there being no mention of the municipal-owned facility on the municipal website. COPA also pointed out that the not-for-profit organization running the airport on behalf of the municipality had broken even or better every year.

In January 2010 COPA wrote to then Transport Minister John Baird reminding him of the 20 year commitment to keep the airport open and asking for his assistance to protect this important transportation infrastructure.

The minister responded six months later, saying:

In 1983 and 1991, Transport Canada provided funding to the City of Mascouche to assist with airport infrastructure upgrades. This funding, which totalled $1.4 million, was granted under a community airport assistance program. In accepting this funding, the City committed to operating, administering and maintaining the airport for a period of 20 years following the signing of both agreements, the latter of which will end on September 26, 2011. After that date, the City of Mascouche will have met its obligations, and Transport Canada will have no authority in the City’s decisions pertaining to the airport.

Appeals to the Quebec provincial Transport Ministry produced similar results.

By 2011 the municipality no longer wanted to turn the airport into a car dealership, but instead wanted to make it a housing development. The mayor indicated that it should be closed by July 2013, to avoid being an election issue in the fall 2013 municipal election.

As a result the municipality is currently engaged in a brief study of the value of the airport land for various uses and have indicated that they will consider retaining it as an airport if it can bring in as much revenue in taxes as other uses would. This criteria is a set-up to fail of course, because the airport is transportation infrastructure, like a highway or a sidewalk is. This narrow view fails to consider all the money that the airport brings into the community in terms of meals, hotel nights and other indirect revenue generated.

For its part the provincial government seems content with any use of the land as long as, if it is no longer public-use, that an equivalent parcel be set aside for public use, although not necessarily as an airport.

COPA wrote to Federal then Transport Minister Chuck Strahl, before the last federal election, asking him to review the National Airports Policy and he replied:

Local communities are the best placed to assess the importance of (airport) services and to seek support, starting locally, for their continuation.

Can Mascouche Airport be saved? It seems clear that the municipality wants it closed and has done so for ten years. Now that the financial and contractual obligations have been satisfied and the provincial and federal governments have walked away from protecting the airport there remains only public pressure to bring to bear on the municipality, which is why the APBQ has started a petition.

In the final assessment the municipality owns the airport and if they want to close it they can.

The story of Mascouche Airport is an example of the continuing failure of the National Airports Policy of 1994. The NAP continues to fail at preserving national transportation infrastructure, it continues to fail Canadians and it continues to be bad public policy, the embodiment of the complete opposite of "nation building".

Note: This article was written using COPA background documents from 2002-2013.

29 January 2013

Nav Canada Study of Ottawa TCA Airspace Consultation

Note: This post is a follow up to the earlier article: Nav Canada to Conduct Study of Ottawa TCA Airspace and Nav Canada Study of Ottawa TCA Airspace Underway.

COPA Flight 8 Captain Mike Shaw remains the contact person for Flight 8's input into this study, so please send your comments to him or post them here for discussion.

Review Of The Structure And Classification Of The Ottawa Terminal Control Area

Consultations - Aeronautical Study

by Yan Tremblay, Nav Canada

Nav Canada undertook an aeronautical study to review the structure and classification of the Ottawa terminal control area.

As the provider of civil air navigation services, NAV CANADA regularly reviews its services to ensure that they match the requirements of aircraft operators. A comprehensive study is forthcoming and will involve consultation with customers and other stakeholders. A hazard and risk analysis will be conducted on any and all proposed changes.

Consultation on this proposal will be conducted on the 27th of February 9:30 am to 14:30 pm at the Local 1217, head office; 77 Metcalfe Street, Ottawa.

Persons wishing to participate as stakeholders, wanting to obtain further information, or that are interested in commenting on this study are invited to reserve their place before the 22nd of February, by contacting the undersigned:

Yan Tremblay
Shift Manager
Montréal Area Control Centre
Nav Canada
1750 Chemin St Francois
Dorval, QC
H9P 2P6
Yan.tremblay@navcanada.ca
service@navcanada.ca
Phone: (514) 633-3365
Fax: (514) 633-3371

28 January 2013

Billy Bishop Goes to War

Flight 8 just heard from former Ottawa Aviation Services Manager and CBC weather presenter Teri Loretto, who is also the Co-Artistic Director at Plosive Productions about the upcoming production of Billy Bishop Goes to War.

Teri explains:

Greetings Flying folks!

Plosive Productions and Ottawa's beautiful Gladstone theatre are preparing to open one of Canada's iconic pieces of theatre, Billy Bishop Goes to War by John Gray.

This show is an award winning two-man musical and features one of Ottawa's finest piano players, James Caswell on his grand piano. Billy Bishop is played by accomplished actor Chris Ralph, hot off his numerous theatrical successes including Noises Off and Speed-the-Plow at The Gladstone, and the smash hit The Game of Love and Chance at Odyssey Theatre last summer. I have the honour of directing this dynamic duo in what's sure to be a highlight of Ottawa's theatrical season.

This story of one of Canada's heroes follows his path from student to flying ace and tells the story through 18 characters in Bishop's life, all played by one actor. The number of 'kills' attributed to Billy Bishop was questioned at the time and continues to be a subject of debate today. What is not a question though, is Billy's ability to fly to the top of his field in an age of adventure and bravery in The Great War. In this play we laugh at the stuffy folk who tried to tame this bad boy of Canadian aviation, glory in his first solo, thrill at the aerial battles that earned him his numerous medals and share his shock as he looks at the horrors of trench warfare.

I can't tell you how great a show this is going to be, and with the 100th anniversary of the start of the First World War coming up in 2014, it is important that we continue to tell the stories of the brave men and women who served in that conflict.

Any persons with limited mobility will appreciate that The Gladstone is fully accessible. There are no steps between the entrance and the front row of seats; we have an accessible washroom; two seats in the front row are designated as wheelchair spots. Our Box Office and Front of House staff will be pleased to assist in any way needed to help patrons to have a comfortable, accessible and enjoyable visit! And as a special treat for this show, the theatre is also hosting a mini-art show in our wheelchair-accessible lobby, curated by The Canadian War Museum and featuring some beautiful works of art from the period.

The show runs Feb. 8th to 23rd, Tuesday to Saturday evenings at 8PM, Saturday and Sunday matinees at 3PM, with a preview at 8PM on Feburary 7. For more information about the show or the theatre, or to buy tickets, contact our Box Office at 613-233-GLAD (4523) or see the production's website.

Webmaster's Note

Any Flight members interested in ticket discounts, please drop Adam Hunt, Flight 8 webmaster, a note.

Cheshire Cat Burns

Early on the morning of 28 January 2013 the Ottawa Fire Department were called to fight a fire at the Cheshire Cat Pub and Restaurant and the corner of Carp Road and Richardson Side Road. Ottawa Fire Chief John deHooge described the fire as "stubborn".

Fire crews were on the scene early, but the lack of any fire hydrants nearby the very rural location, slowed fighting the blaze. At least 20 trucks, including tankers, with 50 firefighters attend the scene. The blaze was too hot to fight inside the building, forcing crews to work from the outside.

No one was in the building when the fire broke out and no injuries were reported.

The building was reportedly totally destroyed by the fire. The bell tower on the former rural school building collapsed after the fire had been burning for five hours.

The Cheshire Cat has been a favourite gathering spot for Carp Airport pilots over the years due to its close proximity to the airport and its status as the nearest and best place to eat in the area. Hopefully the pub owners will be able to rebuild their business, but it looks like Carp pilots will have to find a new pub for now!

(Official Ottawa Fire Dept Photo)

Media stories:

26 January 2013

APBQ Starts Petition to Keep Mascouche Airport Open

The Aviateurs et Pilotes de Brousse de Quebec (APBQ) (English: Quebec Bush Pilots Association) has started a petition to keep the Mascouche Airport open.

Their request for help says:

We ask for your signature on a petition for Mascouche Airport.

On January 21, the City Council adopted a resolution Mascouche to unilaterally close Mascouche Airport, without real alternative for entrepreneurs and airmen who are based there.

To this end, an online petition has been launched to support Mascouche Airport.

We kindly ask you to sign to bring your media to an airport that is in great need.

It is a small gesture that can free make a big difference in this fight that leads the APPAM since 2009 and which provides support APBQ.

Thank you in advance for your support

See also

17 January 2013

Enstrom Helicopter Corporation Is Purchased

Enstrom Helicopter Corporation has recently been purchased by the Chongqing Helicopter Investment Co of the People's Republic of China, adding to the long list of US-based aerospace companies to be bought out.

In some ways Enstrom is a bit of a different case as it hasn't been US-owned in a decade. It was founded by Rudy Enstrom in 1959, but he sold a controlling interest to Purex Industries in 1968. After that it had a long list of owners, including F. Lee Bailey who bought control in January 1971, but he sold out in 1979 to a string of owners that included Remington shaver "I bought the company" entrepreneur Victor Kiam and later Segway designer Dean Kamen. In 2000 it was sold to anonymous Swiss interests, moving ownership out of the US. It was those same anonymous Swiss who this week sold it to the Chinese company.

Enstrom has had some lean years though the recession, cutting helicopter production and laying off staff. In 2010 they only shipped six helicopters. Things seem to be looking up lately, though, as the company has been selling helicopters in Asia and is expanding both its workforce and looking to build more plant space at its Menominee, Michigan location.

At this point in its history Chinese capital and expertise in Asian markets is probably a good thing for the company and will help it grow further. Of course, as usual, North American investment was not forthcoming, a story seen very often in the aerospace industry in recent years. As a result Enstrom Helicopter Corporation gets added to my growing list:

  • Cirrus Aircraft - Government of the Peoples Republic of China
  • Continental Engines - Government of the Peoples Republic of China
  • Diamond Aircraft - majority owned by Medrar Financial Group, Dubai
  • Enstrom Helicopter Corporation - Chongqing Helicopter Investment Co, China
  • Epic Aircraft - Engineering LLC, Russia
  • Flightstar Sportplanes - rights, tooling and parts inventory purchased by Yuneec International, China
  • Glasair Aircraft - Jilin Hanxing Group, China
  • International Lease Finance Corp - 90% New China Trust Co Ltd, New China Life Insurance Co Ltd, P3 Investments Ltd and China Aviation Industrial Fund
  • Liberty Aerospace - 75% owned by the Kuwait Finance House, a wholly owned subsidiary of Kuwait Finance House of Bahrain
  • Piper Aircraft - Government of Brunei
  • Superior Air Parts - Weifang Tianxiang Technology Group, China

So I wonder who will be next?

Further reading

01 January 2013

Canadian Private Fleet Growth Slows In 2012

The Canadian private civil aircraft fleet continued to grow in 2012, but at a rate that was the lowest seen since 2003 and worse than at any time during the recession of 2008-10.

In 2008 the fleet grew at 3.2%, in 2009 by 2.2% reflecting the recession, in 2010 increased to 2.3% and in 2011 up to 2.5%. In 2012 it was down to just 1.96%.

The numbers seem to indicate that recession is still with us, especially with regard to aircraft sales. As in recent years the fact that the fleet has continued to grow and not shrink is probably due to the persistently high asking prices for used aircraft in Canada, as the US economy and its dollar remained weak through all of 2012. Aircraft asking prices in Canada should be lower than they are, with the Canadian dollar near par against the US dollar, but Canadian asking prices remained consistently higher than US prices this past year, encouraging cross-border aircraft shopping and driving up the overall number of aircraft registered in Canada. As I have noted before, the main problem remains that many of those for-sale-but-over-priced-aircraft are also not being flown much, so while the Canadian civil fleet grows in size, the amount of flying probably isn't increasing and may in fact be decreasing.

In 2012 the total Canadian civil fleet increased in size by 593, compared to 772 in 2011, 642 aircraft in 2010, 600 in 2009 and 803 aircraft in 2008. In 2012 the private segment of the fleet accounted for 92% of the growth seen, increasing by 544, while the commercial aircraft fleet increased by 56 aircraft, a substantial drop over 2011's commercial fleet increase of 94 aircraft. Apparently the economy isn't booming in commercial aviation either.

The state fleet, those aircraft owned by the various levels of government in Canada, continued to shrink this past year by seven aircraft, with the decrease made up of five helicopters and two airplanes.

Basic Ultralights

For the last number of years BULAs have been the second quickest growing area of private aviation, after certified aircraft, but in 2012 they moved into the number one spot, probably reflecting their low purchase and operating costs. In 2012 the category increased by 191 aircraft and accounted for 35% of the private fleet growth. There were 5,627 BULAs registered at the end of 2011.

Certified Aircraft

For the past few years, certified aircraft have been leading the growth in private aircraft numbers for Canada, but they lost that lead to basic ultralights in 2012. The comparatively low US dollar combined with high asking prices for aircraft in Canada makes US imports cheaper than buying domestically. The numbers increased in 2012 with 172 certified aircraft added, down from 2011's total of 228. In 2012 the new additions to the certified fleet were made up of 167 airplanes and 11 balloons, offset by the loss of five helicopters and one glider.

Certified aircraft accounted for 32% of the private fleet growth in 2012. There were 16,106 private certified aircraft at the end of 2012, out of a total of 28,271 private aircraft registered.

Amateur-builts

Amateur-built aircraft were in the number three slot again in 2012, increasing by 98, down from an increase of 137 in 2011. In 2011 the aircraft added were made up of 95 airplanes, six helicopters and two balloons, while the number of gyroplanes decreased by five. Amateur-builts made up 18% of the aircraft added to the private fleet in 2012.

Amateur builts now number 3,979 in Canada and include a wide variety of aircraft, from fixed wing airplanes, helicopters, gliders, gyroplanes to balloons, airships and even one ornithopter.

Owner Maintained

The O-M category added 37 aircraft in 2012, up from the 27 added in 2011 and moving it into fourth spot ahead of advanced ultralights. By the end of 2012, there were 583 O-M aircraft on the registry, made up of 571 airplanes and 12 gliders. O-M aircraft made up 7% of the aircraft added to the private fleet in 2012.

This category has suffered from low numbers of aircraft being moved from the certified category ever since the American FAA announced that O-M aircraft will never be allowed to fly in US airspace or sold in the USA. Overall this category seems to be sort of staggering along with minimal interest from owners.

Advanced Ultralights

Advanced Ultralights dropped to fifth place for growth in 2012, increasing their numbers by only 27 airplanes, compared to an increase of 28 in 2011, 39 in 2010 and 42 in 2009. Their growth in numbers in 2012 made up 5% of the private fleet increase and brought the total number of AULAs on the civil register to 1,176. By the category definition, all AULAs are powered fixed wing aircraft.

The AULA category was introduced in 1991 and therefore 2012 was its 21st year. The category has increased its numbers at an average of 56 aircraft per year and so can hardly be considered the success that was anticipated when it was started. As in the past four years, the number of AULAs added in 2012 was well below the average from its earlier years. This seems to indicate that the category is slowly dying out, a trend mostly likely linked to the high price of new AULAs and their American counter-parts, Light-Sport Aircraft.

Commercial Fleet

In 2012 the commercial aircraft fleet increased by 56 aircraft to bring it to 7,011. The numbers show an increase of 20 airplanes and 39 helicopters, offset by a decrease of three balloons. The biggest commercial fleet growth was in twin-engined aircraft, with 34 added, versus 23 singles and four four-engined aircraft. Two three-engined aircraft left the fleet, probably old Boeing 727s being retired.

In round numbers, at the end of 2012 the private fleet made up 80% of the aircraft in Canada, up from 79% last year, with the commercial fleet at 20% and the state fleet at 0.7%. As commercial aviation fails to grow over time private aviation is making up a greater proportion of the fleet.

Imports, Exports and Pilots

Aircraft imports into Canada in 2012 numbered 753, which was down from 861 in 2011 and compares to 774 in 2010 and 673 in 2009, but still well below the 968 imported during the pre-recession days of 2008. In 2012, 731 aircraft were exported, giving a difference of just 22 favouring imported aircraft over those exported.

Transport Canada seems to have stopped publishing pilot licencing statistics in 2011, so a new analysis of pilot population numbers will have to wait until TC makes those numbers available again. The most recent numbers available from 2008-11 show a loss of 2.2% of the pilot population over those three years, an average of 0.7% per year.

Looking at 2013

As 2013 commences, the usual large global economic factors are at play and that have the potential to negatively impact aviation in Canada. These include the risk of war in the Middle East with the likely disruption of world oil markets, as well as the ongoing US and European economic woes.

World oil prices ended 2012 at US$90.80 for North America (WTI) and US$110.62 for Europe (Brent). These were virtually unchanged from a year ago, showing the careful balance between poor economic conditions reducing oil demand and associated prices and economic recovery increasing demand and prices. Poor economic conditions result in less flying because people have less money, but with world oil production stagnant now for eight years economic growth increases demand for this limited resource and results in higher oil prices and the inevitable reduction in flying hours. Some aviation surveys done in 2012 point to high fuel prices being the largest factor in pilots flying less.

Note: Data for this report was taken from the Transport Canada Civil Aircraft Register and reflects the difference between the number of aircraft registered in Canada on 31 December 2011 and 31 December 2012. These statistics reflect the net number of aircraft built and imported, minus the number destroyed, scrapped and exported. Just because an aircraft is registered in Canada does not mean it is being flown and therefore the number of registered aircraft should not be confused with the amount of flying activity.

19 December 2012

Foreign Takeovers - Ultralight Style

I have written here about the recent and extensive buy-out of the North American aerospace industry by middle-eastern and far eastern interests before. It is always interesting to note this business trend and how North American investors just won't go near their own aircraft manufacturers, while foreign investors, especially Chinese investors, will.

Recently I discovered that the Flightstar Sportplanes website was up for sale and after a web search turned up no news at all I wrote to owner Tom Peghiny to find out what that meant.

Thousands of Flightstars have been built and flown since the type was introduced in 1987. They are very popular in the USA where the single seaters can qualify under FAR 103 Ultralight Vehicles rules.

It seems that Flightstar's business dropped off in the early part of the 2008-2010 recession, to the point of mostly just supplying parts and few new aircraft. A contributing factor was the introduction of the US light-sport aircraft rules and the elimination of the two-seat trainer exemption under FAR 103.

Flightstar Sportplanes had been working with Yuneec International of Kunshan, Jiangsu, China on an electric version of the the FlightStar Spyder, called the eSpyder and it seemed a promising aircraft for the future. Flightstar provided the airframe and Yuneec the drivetrain.

When Flightstar sales dropped off Yuneec bought out the Flightstar aircraft line in 2009, including the rights, tooling and the parts inventory. Flightstar Sportplanes business was quietly wound up the same year, with neither company putting out a press release on the deal. The aviation press seems to have missed it altogether.

Yuneec is engaged in developing the single seat eSpyder, and they now have a web page on it that explains design changes coming:

"The already efficient and lightweight airframe, made from aircraft grade aluminium, Carbon Fibre and Chrome-Moly tubing, will be further enhanced with wing tip extensions, new body design and numerous other changes to allow operation under FAR-103 whilst using the Yuneec 20Kw (27Hp) ‘Electric’ Power Drive motor system. Easy to use, extremely quiet, virtually vibration free, low cost operation and environmentally friendly Electric power is the future and E-Spyder leads the way."

Perhaps the two seat Flightstar II model will be re-introduced with one of Yuneec's own brand of Power Drive electric engines as well.

So even on the very light end of aviation it once again looks like Chinese investors have moved in where no one else will, kept existing products flying and continued innovative development.

Here is how the foreign ownership list now looks:

  • Cirrus Aircraft - Government of the Peoples Republic of China
  • Continental Engines - Government of the Peoples Republic of China
  • Diamond Aircraft - majority owned by Medrar Financial Group, Dubai
  • Epic Aircraft - Engineering LLC, Russia
  • Flightstar Sportplanes - rights, tooling and parts inventory purchased by Yuneec International, China
  • Glasair Aircraft - Jilin Hanxing Group, China
  • International Lease Finance Corp - 90% New China Trust Co Ltd, New China Life Insurance Co Ltd, P3 Investments Ltd and China Aviation Industrial Fund
  • Liberty Aerospace - 75% owned by the Kuwait Finance House, a wholly owned subsidiary of Kuwait Finance House of Bahrain
  • Piper Aircraft - Government of Brunei
  • Superior Air Parts - Weifang Tianxiang Technology Group, China

Who will be next?

12 December 2012

Nav Canada Study of Ottawa TCA Airspace Underway

Note: This post is a follow up to the earlier article: Nav Canada to Conduct Study of Ottawa TCA Airspace

COPA Flight 8 Captain Mike Shaw remains the contact person for Flight 8's input into this study, so please send your comments to him or, better yet post them here for discussion.

Message from COPA

Patrick Gilligan, Vice President, Operations, Canadian Owners and Pilots Association writes:

"Nav Canada is proposing airspace change to the region of Ottawa and Quebec from currently class D airspace specified as transponder airspace to reclassify as class C airspace. The purpose is to eliminate conflict between IFR and VFR aircraft. For complete details see the message/invitation for comments below and the included document.

  • Class D specified as transponder airspace, requires bilateral communication with appropriate ATC, the pilot’s intended flight and an encoding transponder.
  • Class C requires authorization from ATC, bilateral communication with appropriate ATC with the pilot’s intended flight and an encoding transponder.

Message from Nav Canada

Yan Tremblay, Nav Canada writes:

As per the Oct 30th, 2012 notices of aeronautical study for the review of the structure and classification of the Ottawa TCA and Quebec City TCA/CZ, Nav Canada initially met with COPA, APBQ and AQTA on Nov 30th to provide details on the proposed changes and search feedback from their executive and membership.

This document is distributed to support the association’s internal briefing. Feedback is to be provided directly to the following point of contact no later than Jan 7th, 2013.

Nav Canada will soon after schedule local consultation meetings at Ottawa and Quebec City for a broader feedback.

Yan Tremblay
Shift Manager
Montréal Area Control Centre
Nav Canada
1750 Chemin St Francois
Dorval, QC
H9P 2P6
Yan.tremblay@navcanada.ca
service@navcanada.ca
Phone: (514) 633-3365
Fax: (514) 633-3371

Nav Canada Ottawa/Québec Airspace Change Proposal

COPA – APBQ – AQTA Briefing, November 30, 2012

As per the Oct 30, 2012 notices of aeronautical study for the review of the structure and classification of the Ottawa TCA and Quebec City TCA/CZ, Nav Canada initially met with COPA, APBQ and AQTA on Nov 30 to provide details on the proposed changes and search feedback from their executive and membership.

This document is distributed to support the association’s internal briefing. Feedback is to be provided directly to the following point of contact no later than Jan 7, 2013.

Nav Canada will soon after schedule local consultation meetings at Ottawa and Quebec City for a broader feedback.

QUEBEC AIRSPACE PROPOSED CHANGES (TCA and CZ)

(Refer to the attached depictions)

  • IFR/VFR conflicts are frequent and repeating occurrences in this airspace. The current “D” airspace classification does not support systematic conflict resolution between IFR and VFR aircraft. Consequently Nav Canada is opting for changing the TCA and CZ classification to “C” (ref RAC 801.02).
  • INSET A: Floor raised from 3500’ to 4500’ to reflect the actual use of the airspace and relieve VFR compression
  • INSET B: The frequency range in this quadrant is affected by terrain. Broken communications are often experienced. Raising the floor from 1400’ to 2500’ will mitigate the issue.
  • INSET C: Floor raised from 1400’ to 2500’ to reflect the actual use of the airspace and relieve VFR compression
  • INSET D: Floor raised from 1400’ to 1500’ to relieve VFR compression especially at CNV9 and CST7
  • INSET E: Floor raised from 3500’ to 4000’ to relieve VFR compression and allow for the CYA616 alternative
  • INSET F: Withdrawal and replacement of the Class F CYA616 airspace and surrounding Class D airspace (when CYA616 is not active) by a Class E transponder required airspace from 2000’ to below 4000’.

Through the use of radar, ATC will provide wake turbulence separation between IFR and VFR aircraft operating within the transponder required Class E airspace through mandatory ATC operating procedures. VFR training operation will not be impacted by the change neither required to be in contact with ATC.

IFR traffic operating in the southern portion of the Quebec airspace will benefit from additional altitude options when conditions dictate (ie CB, turbulence, icing, IFR conflicts)

The Class E airspace final dimensions still need to be defined through consultations with customers.

OTTAWA AIRSPACE PROPOSED CHANGES (TCA)

  • IFR/VFR conflicts are frequent and repeating occurrences in this airspace. The current “D” airspace classification does not support systematic conflict resolution between IFR and VFR aircraft. Consequently Nav Canada is opting for changing the TCA classification to “C” (ref RAC 801.02).
  • INSET A: Floor raised from 2500’ to 4000’ over the CYND Class E airspace, north of the powerline for allowing VFR traffic to exit the CYND airspace without entering the Class C airspace (formerly D).
  • INSET B: VFR aircraft transiting to/from practice area (yellow arrows) elect to stay on the ATC frequency while operating below the current 2500’ Class D airspace south of the YOW VOR. VFR aircraft transiting below the current 2500’ Class D airspace south of the YOW VOR (red arrow) are not on the ATC frequency.

This results in conflicts within the same airspace between VFR aircraft on separate frequencies. Locally changing the floor from 2500’ to 1500’ will ensure the CYOW – Practice Area flow is operated entirely under the same airspace rules during the transition to and from the CZ.

CYOW Noise Management Committee

Noise is not a big issue for Ottawa’s International Airport. Sure there was a considerable bump in noise complaints during the summer while runway 07-25 was being resurfaced. During that period most traffic was handled on runway 14-32 thereby routing it over populated areas of the city that normally see fewer aircraft. In fact, excluding the 151 complaints generated during resurfacing 07-25, there was about 61 complaints generated during normal operations using both runways 07-25 and 14-32. This compares well with previous years complaints.

That said, there were some very angry folks affected by noise during the resurfacing of 07-25. One somewhat childish complainer would hold the phone to the air to pick up a passing jet and then yell a profanity into the phone. The complaints extended across Gatineau, QC and in the highly populated approach and departure paths to runway 14-32.

Still with all runways in operation the dominate aircraft type generating most complaints is the light Cessna used for flight training. And for these aircraft it is their circuit over populated regions that generates the complaints. The other activity that generates significant noise complaints are police operations which tend to circle at relatively low altitude over a small area for considerable time, even at night.

2014 will see runway 14-32 resurfaced, but it is expected to generate fewer noise complaints than happened this summer. There may be some impact on long haul flights from Ottawa that need the extra length provided by use of runway 14-32. So we may see slightly fewer long haul flights and perhaps some passenger complaints about less convenient flights. Of course these complaints will fall on the airlines.

This is rough summary of the Noise Management Committee meeting I attended this afternoon at the airport. If you have a comment or concern do not hesitate to contact me.